Is 9,800–10,200 KPH at 99% good

On numeric-only batches, over three 60-minute runs in TypingMaster’s 10-key test, I average 9,800–10,200 KPH at 99.2–99.6% accuracy, with 0.4% more accuracy costing me about 18–22 seconds per 1,000 entries… What benchmarks do you use for entry-level vs production work, and where would you draw the line between speed and accuracy on live jobs?

‌⁠‍⁠​‍​‍‌⁠‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌‍‌⁠‌‍‌​‌‍‍‍​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍⁠​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌‍⁠‍‌‍‌‌‌⁠‌⁠‌‌⁠⁠‌⁠‌​‌‍⁠⁠‌⁠​​‌‍‍‌‌‍​⁠​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌‍⁠‍‌‍‌‌‌⁠‌⁠​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍​⁠​‍​⁠​​​⁠​‍​⁠‌‌​⁠​‌​⁠​‍​⁠​‍​⁠‌‌​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌⁠‌​‌‍‍⁠‌​​‌‌​⁠‌‌‍‍​‌​​‍‌⁠‌‌‌⁠‌⁠‌⁠​‌​⁠‌​‌‍‌‍‌‍⁠⁠‌‍‌‌‌‍​⁠‌⁠‌‍​⁠‌​​‍​‍‌⁠⁠‌​​

That’s solid; for numeric-only I treat 10k KPH at 99.5% as production-ready, with entry-level around 8–9k at 98–99%. Run a 30‑minute mock job using double-entry or spot-check QA and see if pushing from “99.2–99.6%” lowers total time once fixes are counted. If there’s no QA safety net I slow until errors stay under 0.5% — measure twice, type once.

‌⁠‍⁠​‍​‍‌⁠‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌‍‌⁠‌‍‌​‌‍‍‍​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍⁠​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌⁠​‍‌‍‌‌‌⁠​​‌‍⁠​‌⁠‍‌​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​⁠‌‍​⁠‍​​⁠​​​⁠‌​​⁠‌‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍​⁠​‍​⁠​​​⁠​‍​⁠‌‌​⁠​‌​⁠​‍​⁠​‍​⁠‌‍​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌​‍‍‌‍‍‌‌⁠​​‌​‍​‌​‍​‌‍​‌‌‌​‍‌⁠‌‍‌‌​‍‌‌‌⁠‌‍‍‌‌‌‌‌‌⁠‍‍‌​​‍‌​​‌‌‌‌⁠​‍​‍‌⁠⁠‌